Could Piebald be inc-dom rather than recessive?

[t_h_wyman]

@eaglereptiles

I’m willing to take that lecture though if it’s on offer.

Ugh. Ugh I tell you! LOL

If I get enough of a head of steam about me I can see about trying to draft it all up. In the interim, it might just be easier to direct you back to my visit to either Reptile Gumbo podcast or Morelia Python Radio podcast.
.
.

@eaglereptiles

Would this be along the lines as Piebald and Spider creating a high white snake?

Nope, Spider and Pied are totally different genes, not alleles. What we see there is synergy
.
.

@eaglereptiles

I’m still not sure I quite get this term.

Genetic
Reduced
Pattern

.
.

@eaglereptiles

I ask with real enthusiasm that you fill in some of the Glossary

Again I tell you - UGH!
.
.

@owalreptiles

because this:

@t_h_wyman

Recessive/dominance is considered against the WT allele of the given gene. Different genetic backgrounds are irrelevant as the relationship between these alleles remains the same

Is Exactly what I’m saying

Then I am confused because I got the impression you were saying we can only determine inc-dom in an animal that is fully wild-type other than being het for the gene in question while I am saying it does not matter if there are zero other morphs or fifteen other morphs. So it seemed to me that we were on two different wavelengths
.
.

@owalreptiles

Personally I will throw hypo and clown into the mix with pied

I do not, and never have, worked with eitherthese morphs so I cannot ante in on them from a personal side. However, at least with Hypo, I would not be at all surprised
.
.

@owalreptiles

They aren’t expressed in the heterozygous form and only in the homozygous form.

What do you mean Lesser and Fire are not expressed in the heterozygous form?? Lesser or Fire are the heterozygous form…