For each of these, we need to know what kind of gene it is (recessive/incdom/dom) OR what combination of genes represent it. Feel free to additional lines and aliases.
There are 2 lines of caramel, one is the waterview or wei line, the other is the gulf coast line. They are not compatible with each other, so should be listed as separate morphs, same way as the different lines of axanthic are for ball pythons.
Hypo is an incomplete dominant trait, the super form is ivory.
Scaleless is recessive
Silver sided butterscotch is a recessive morph that originated in the dwarf subspecies
Fader I believe was never able to be proven to be genetic, but I’m open to correction on that.
Regarding bedrock/leopard/jigsaw, these would be considered het markers, like het pied markers in ball pythons, I wouldn’t bother listing them as a trait, breeders can always just use these terms in the description if they wish.
Honestly the first 9 in the top category is probably the only ones that need trait tags right now. Haven’t really seen the other ones in the states. I’d stop after dwarf. Can add more later?
Looks like you’ve got everything pretty set. But to add to it Paradoxing has been proven to have a familial inheritance. And Champagne has also been proven to be recessive.
in regards to Smoke, Stonewash, Lava, Fader, and Butter. there is a language barrier that has been preventing a lot of information being obtained as these animals are not in the states currently.
And the other line bred traits I don’t think really need a subcategory as they are really just hets.
Smoke, champagne, stonewash, and fader are recessive. Fader has a bit a of refining in other countries tho. When it WAS in the states, it was bred to one another (creating double hets not known at the time). There are 2 maybe more lines of fader. The project then was sold and died off.
Butter is said to be recessive from what I’ve gotten off of a few in other countries. But, like said below, the language barrier is hard.
Keeping a clear informative description on the linebred traits is important. Is there are a lot of misinformed people that think they are actual genes. (Which leopard was proved not to be by Tom Reagan in the early 2000s).
For the caramel gene, there might be a few additions to the lines in the coming years. I have an unproven line, and Ben Rodgers and myself are working on bringing the Ultramel line back with some pos hets.