Ethics of Spiders and Spider Breeding

I am right over the 100 snake mark with hatchlings right now :face_with_spiral_eyes:

4 Likes

My one problem with people saying “they don’t look like they are in pain”
is that we really can’t tell I mean animals I.G don’t show pain well. (I know this for a fact)
not saying they are downright WRONG but still.

Pain=stress
Stress=won’t breed, won’t eat, respiratory infections, etc. Those of us who’ve been breeding ball pythons for 7-10-15+ years know what a stressed out animal looks and acts like.

How do so many Spiders live full lives if they’re in pain and thereby under major stress?

Many of us have a large number of these animals who’re living healthy uneventful lives. We have a much larger sample size and many more years of experience than most pet keepers have or will achieve. It’s hard to refute the experience of the hobby at large, that they eat fantastically, and breed well often over decades of life.

10 Likes

I agree, just because they can’t say how they feel, doesn’t mean you can’t tell.

Our spider doesn’t like it when his enclosure is changed, he shows his frustration and so we keep changes to a minimal.

I think it comes down to how well you know your snakes on a personal level and the experience you’ve had with them.

5 Likes

While I agree with you overall with the spider gene this is not true at all imo ball pythons are notoriously easy to breed they certainly will breed when they are stressed and when it isn’t always good for them health wise. People get clutches all the time from there stressed and or unhealthy ball pythons. I think plenty of us who have done this long enough have had plenty of moments where we have cringed at the condition of a ball python that a “breeder” has gotten to “successfully” reproduce. I feel by using they wouldn’t breed argument we just give the anti spider side more bullet points because imo it’s simply not true.

3 Likes

Sure they will once or maybe even twice but nothing that’s really stressed is going recover, breed, recover, breed, etc over and over again for a decade or two.

2 Likes

Agree they would probably die eventually but I do believe even stressed and unhealthy they will do it longer than people realize. So I don’t think we should use this to justify a pro spider view point.

2 Likes

If we accept this premise (I am not saying I do or do not, just using this as a logic problem) then we also have to accept the opposite premise that the combination of our inability to tell and the animal’s tendency to “hide” pain means that you also cannot use/rely on/perpetuate the argument of “But they are in pain because only an animal in pain would act like that.”

Two sides of the same coin

4 Likes

that’s fair I see what you’re talking about, makes sense!

Here’s our take:
We don’t touch wobble-prone genes or Supers (or others with possible health issues.) This means we have a collection free of Spider, Champagne, Woma, HGW, or Sable, and we will not produce Super Spotnose/Black Pastel/Black Head etc.

Does this feel limiting at times?
In all honesty? A little. It’s hard to not get a little fomo when a big breeder pushes out a new Champagne combo, or when we can’t pair two SNs.

However, NOTHING is worth it to us to risk an animal’s wellbeing. As keepers, we see ourselves as their guardians and we take “playing god” with genetics and creating little lives as a sacred responsibility. It is a luxury to be able to sit at a keyboard and speculate whether or not they could feel this pain. We ask – if it’s even a possibility, why risk it just for something as superficial as aesthetics?

There is clearly something basally unsound with the Spider gene – if you have two animals that look the same, the end result should not be dead offspring. (Is this a :hot_pepper: hot take :hot_pepper:? Maybe. But I quite literally have my degree in this.)

TLDR:
We have a responsibility to do right by our animals and their offspring, based on the best knowledge we have at any given point. We won’t tell anyone how they should run their collection, and we aren’t trying to pick a fight. We can only say that never bring wobble-genes in has been right for us; it’s resulted in sleeping easier and appreciative customers.

Keep on Herping,

  • Fawkes
2 Likes

Indeed, this is a very hot take.

You should also add Chocolate, wookie, and cypress to your list. And despite spotnose in general not displaying wobble a close friend of my produced a single gene spotnose that has as much wobble as any bad spider does.

1 Like

I feel the same way. I don’t have anything against anyone for keeping spiders, i just have no intention of doing so. I believe that spider bp’s even with wobble has a chance to liver a happy life, just like any other animal, but for me there are plenty other beautiful morphs out there that don’t have wobble. And i am going to agree with @zooophagous here, I wouldn’t buy an animal that has been intentionally bred knowing there’s a defect. No hate against spiders or spider breeders, just my overall take on things.

1 Like